People are beginning to use home robots in their daily lives. With the rapid development of technology, robots are no longer only used in factories but also appear in many households. Although home robots bring many benefits, they also have some disadvantages.

Using home robots has several advantages. First, they can help people with housework such as cleaning, cooking, or taking care of elderly people. This saves time and effort, especially for busy families. Second, home robots can work continuously without getting tired, which makes life more convenient. In addition, some robots are designed to provide companionship, helping people feel less lonely and improving their quality of life.

However, there are some disadvantages to owning home robots. The biggest problem is their high cost, which many families cannot afford. Moreover, robots depend heavily on technology, so they may break down or malfunction. Another disadvantage is that overusing robots may make people lazy and reduce real human interaction.

In conclusion, home robots may make lives easier and happier, but there are certain problems as well. Therefore, people should consider both sides before using them.

The line graph shows the urban and rural population in Viet Nam from 1960 to 2020. Overall, the urban population increased while the rural population decreased.

In 1960, most Vietnamese people lived in rural areas. However, from 1960 to 1980, the percentage of the rural population fell slightly to 81 per cent. Then the figure remained stable for the next ten years. From 1990 to 2000, the proportion of the population living in rural areas continued to decrease gradually. In 2020, the rural population was only 63 per cent of the total population of Viet Nam.

By contrast, the urban population rose throughout the same period. In 1960, the percentage of the city population was just around 15 per cent. The figure went up slightly in 1980 and remained stable until 1990 when less than 20 per cent of the population lived in urban areas. Since 1990, the proportion of the urban population has increased gradually and in 2020, it reached 37 per cent of the total population.

This report addresses the issues of traffic congestion, noise, and air pollution at the school's entrance, and proposes two potential solutions.

Many parents drive their children to and from school daily, leading to long lines of private cas and motorcycles outside the school gate twice a day, five days a week. Consequently, traffic jams, noise, and air pollution have worsened, which negatively impacts the health of both students and parents as well as the surrounding environment. 

To solve this problem, we suggest two solutions. First, students should be encouraged to use public transport such as buses if they live far away from school. The school could arrange for free bus tickets to motivate students to use public transport. Second, those who live near school should be invited to join the school Cycling-to-school programme, which will help them find an experienced cycling buddy who lives nearby and knows the safe cycling routes to school.

By promoting the use of public transport and cycling to school, we can create a greener school environment and foster a green lifestyle among the youth. Therefore, it is recommended to implement these solutions as soon as possible.