Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
There are complaints that bad news overwhelms our television. Some people think that television news should be a mixture of good and bad news. I absolutely support the idea.
First of all, it is understandable that the majority of television news being reported is bad news, such as: wars, famines, accidents and crime. There is a saying: Joy is easy to forget and sadness is easy to remember. The bad news often disturbs us and makes us curious. The more views from the audience, the more profitable the media organizations are.
However, in terms of psychological and medical concerns, if people are frequently exposed to bad news, they will also be affected mentally, gradually they become over-anxious and suspicious. A more dangerous thing is a lack of faith in life. If so, it is getting more and more difficult for us to see good things than to see bad things.
While it is true that most of our media used to be bad news, it is undeniable that the attractiveness of many significant news programs like Loving Leaves (Cặp lá yêu thương - a volunteer program on VTV); news about anti-epidemic doctors who work day and night to protect societal health; ...
Sum up, I believe that in order to have a rich and meaningful life, we need to have a multi-dimensional perspective. Good news and bad news are both pieces of life and need to be harmonized in the media to bring an authentic, objective and appropriate view to audience.
It is thought by some people that there should be a mixture of good and bad news on television. Personally, I completely agree with this view.
The majority of television news being reported is bad news: wars, famines, accidents, and crime. It is obvious that bad news, by its nature, is appealing to people. Their attention can be achieved by broadcasting negative news. People want to know more about wars and criminal behaviors as opposed to peace and good deeds in their community.
However, it is undeniable that bad news have negative impact on people's lives. If the media publishes too much bad news, people will be left feeling hopeless and anxious. They can be stressed and under pressure after reading such type of news.
Thus, the news should report the good happening in the world alongside the bad. Good news such as stories about someone’s achievements, successful personalities, and positive contributions can encourage others to work hard. Some programs about building shelters for the homeless, donating clothes for the poor and so on, these should be shown on TV as well.
In brief, if the media establishes the balance between both types of news, the society will be harmonious and peaceful. This will prevent anxiety and insecurity among the viewers.
For centuries, deforestation, farming, urbanisation and other human activities have wreaked havoc with wild animal species and sent them to the verge of extinction. Regarding wildlife protection, awareness has been raised and attempts have been made. However, some hold the idea that the protection of endangered species has been given inordinate amount of attention and resources. Personally, I do not see eye to eye with this point of view.In the first place, wildlife protection has never taken centre stage on the media.Compared with celebrities, for example, the amount of coverage of wild animals isinfinitesimal. Clearly, the reason is profits. In other words, programs featuring wildanimals do not generate interest of the public and accordingly returns for theproducers. The absence of educational programs concerning the lives of wild animalshas blinded people to the reality that wild animals are dying and the ecological systemare being disrupted severely. In addition, governments around the world do not prioritise wildlife conservation in their agenda’s. As a matter of fact, laws to save wild animals have been introduced, but they are loosely enforced. Because of this, every man can freely exploit land, chop down forests, and divert the water sources, all of which combine to destroy the natural habitats of threatened animals. In every corners of the world, with or without intention, human are still causing changes in climatic and geopgraphical conditions, which accelerates of animal extinction. In light of this fact, I feel that not enough attention and resources are being given in the conservation of wild flora and fauna and stronger actions need to be taken to save them.
Music is a great way to bring people of different cultures and ages together” -I totally agree with this point. I think EDM (Electronic Dance Music) is the best music that I've heard. people create. Music plays an important role in our modern world. It can eliminate cultural and generational differences. Music has the ability to broaden people's horizons and welcome different cultures from all over the world. Needless to say, each country has its own traditions to enforce their culture and norms. Music can bridge this cultural gap and is a great way to help individuals collaborate better with others. For example, music parties like Tomorrowland are held all over the world, giving citizens from all over the world the opportunity to get in touch with the national culture and gain a deeper understanding of it. Overall, we cannot deny the importance of music in our lives and its ability to connect people from different cultural backgrounds and ages.
Some people believe that printed newspapers are becoming worthless in the contemporary life. While there are a variety of ground supporting this view, I would argue that printed newspapers continue to play an essential role in life.
Continuous advancement in technology provides people with more convenient options for gathering news which are alternatives for printed newspapers. First, an enormous number of articles or reports nowadays could be assessed merely via smartphones or computer with the internet connection, and not only does the news contain a broad spectrum of contents but it can also be updated by the minute. It is obviously more convenient than the traditional measure of reading news, for example, on daily newspapers with limited content in few pages. Second, the spread of alternative options namely the radio or the internet which reach almost every corner of the world has reduced the dependence on printed newspapers as a main source of information.
Despite such advantages of the news conveys by other faster means, I consider that there is still a continuing need for printed newspapers today. One reason is that reading a newspaper is a daily habit which many people, especially the elderly, still enjoy. They are really interested in the leisurely routine of reading newspapers over breakfast or drinking cups of coffee. Another consideration is people can share the newspapers with others since printed newspapers can simply be picked up or put down at a will. For example, I often read a newspaper on the train or bus and then leave the paper on the seat for other passengers if they wish.
In conclusion, albeit the increasing availability of other high-speed sources of news, newspapers still contribute a certain value to human life today.
Fill each of the numbered blanks in the following passages. Use only ONE word for each space
Many people dream of (1)..living... in a foreign country. It can be an amazing experience (2)...for.... those who have the courage to leave their family and friends and settle down in a new place. (3)....however..., there's one potential problem you should be aware of: culture shock. Culture shock is the feeling we get from living in a place that is so different to where we grew up that we are not sure (4)...how.... to deal with it. Societies are organized in many different ways, and we can often (5)...be... taken aback by some of the things we find in foreign countries. Customs and traditions can be very different and that can sometimes make (6).it..... difficult to get on with local people and to make friends. They migt not approve of things you do or might object to things you say. You might even be banned from doing things in another country that are perfectly legal in your own. (7)...if... you were to move to a country such as Singapore, say, you might find some of the laws very (8)...quickly.. There, people can be forced to pay a large fine just for dropping litter. Eventually, (9)..though..., most people who live abroad fall in love with their adopted country and learn to accept its differences. It does take real courage to make such a big change (10)...in.. your life, but many people agree that it is worth it in the end
1. They often show the name of the company that made them.
2. Yes,they do.
3. Because they want to show they are fashionable and have good taste.
4. People often see the advertisements on TV and hear them on the radio.
5. No,they aren't.
Advertisements are very important in the modern world. Often your T-shirt or jeans show the name of the company that made them. This is a popular form of advertising. A special picture or symbol, called logo, is sometimes used.
You see logos on many different products. The idea of a logo is that whenever you see it, you think of that product or company.
Many people like to buy a product because it is made by a certain company. Some people only buy a product that is made by a famous company. People wear clothes and carry bags that have a famous label to show that they are fashionable and have good taste.
It is very common to see advertisements on TV and hear them on the radio. Most advertisements are only a few seconds long but very attractive. Sometimes, the advertiser uses a slogan because it is easy to say and easy to remember.
The idea of advertisements is to try to make you buy the product. They sometimes show rich and famous people using that product. The message is, if you want to feel rich and famous, then buy this product.
1. What do your T-shirt or jeans often show?
=> They often show the name of the company that made them
2. Do many people like to buy a product which is made by a certain company?
=> Yes , they do
3. Why do people wear clothes and carry bagsthat have a famous label?
=> Because they want to show they are fashionable and have good taste
4. where do people often see and hear advertisement?
=> People often see the advertisements on TV and hear them on the radio
5.Are most advertisements short?
=>No , they aren't
Bạn tham khảo nhé !!
Parents can be the best teacher for every child coming on this earth. I agree with this statement as no learning institution can be compared with the parents as they are role models for their children since they open their eyes in this world till they are fully grown up and matured.
To start with when the child is born he sees his parents as his guide, mentor & teacher who will teach him how to speak, eat, drink, live, wear, interact etc. No one will be with him when he is crying for anything it will be the parents who will be with him for every problem and his / her every need. Even during his education days he will observe and learn that the school although is the learning institution but the moral & ethical values learned from parents are far greater than any learning center and parents will be the one who wants the children to be the best in this world and they want their children not to repeat the mistakes that they have done in their lives which any learning institution won’t care for as they can’t give individual attention to every student.
On the other hand, we see that generally the children who are orphans or could not get the attention from their parents don’t have that foundation of ethical, moral and social values as compared to the ones who have been trained by their parents despite all of them have gone to schools, colleges etc. The only difference between them is parents.
If the parents are not well educated they could still prove to be good teachers for their children but that will be of less fruitful from the highly educated parents as educated and learned parents will have more vision and more horizon as compared to the unlearned.
I would like to conclude with the statement that parents can be a turning point for his child if he tries to teach every step of living this life.
As this recent infographic illustrates, the most widely used language on the internet is English, which is used on more than half of all the pages on the web. Those pages cover every style of English – business, conversational, scientific reports, news, sports, debates, local dialects and more – which makes the internet an ideal resource for interactive learning.
While access to current English books or newspapers may not be easy, you can always use the internet to find content on almost any topic. Practise your English language learning by reading books or newspaper articles, listening to the radio or podcasts and by watching streaming videos of TV and film.
You can use the internet to shape your language studies. If you’re learning English to go on holiday, for example, you can look up detailed information about the place that you’ll be visiting. Or if you’re learning English for your career, you can find out more about the sector you work in, including common words and phrases, and industry-specific terminology.
One of the biggest advantages of using the internet to support your language learning is how much it can help you understand the culture of another country. This is especially true when it comes to watching video online. Watching the news, including sports coverage, or popular TV shows can help you see the world through the eyes of another country and give you an insight into how its culture differs from your own.
But perhaps the most exciting opportunity that the internet presents English language learners is the ability to communicate in real-time with native speakers. Using video calling, instant messaging and online forums means you can join in live conversations and debate – a superb way to practise your spoken and written English.
And, as anyone who has ever made an error when posting a comment on a blog will tell you, there are always lots of people willing to help you correct your grammar!


It is common that the highest management of businesses is covered by senior and experienced leaders. However, some people believe in the fact, that young generation should take over. I'm partially agree with this statement. This essay will discuss this interesting topic and provide evidence and examples.
Firstly, business' success is depended on its leaders, who manage lower ranked managers, staff and labours. The Leadership is something individuals are born with or can be taught at universities. Many organisations are critically reliant on experienced staff who provides the best model role to others. In particular banks, businesses focused on human resources cannot be supervised by young staff. This named professions require highly qualified, trained and experienced individuals. Th experience is something people learn over the years, as a result of this, young people are not suitable to be in leading position.
From the other hand, many companies such as Apple, Google, Facebook etc. are seeking young experts with fresh and innovative ideas to boost their profit. Notwithstanding, senior and experienced managers are essential in matter of financial control, their ideas might be out of date. Young generation accommodated easily to new technology and software than their elder society, based on this fact, their performance in leadership will be highly appreciated. The named global companies are the clear example of business empowered by unexperienced, however, graduated individuals.
To sum up, so called older people in managers position might benefit any business, nevertheless, young leaders should be more innovative and experienced from their lifestyle.
bạn nên lập luận ra thì bài sẽ đầy đủ và nghe thuyết phục hơn!
Bạn chú ý không lấy bài mẫu trên mạng nhé !
Nguồn: Directors and managers of organizations are often older people Some people say that it is better for younger people to be leaders To what extent do you agree or disagree | testbig
I think this position should be given to young people. On the one hand, there are many reasons why it is said that old people can make good leaders. Perhaps the first reason is that because older people often accumulate a large amount of professional knowledge and practical experience over many years of work, they are able to make better decisions. It is clear that today's business environment changes rapidly and it is difficult for young people with little experience to deal with unexpected situations. Another reason is that people seem to be more respected by others and have a stronger voice. As a result, employees tend to be more obedient and they will easily run the company's operations. However, on the other hand, I think hiring young people to be managers seems to be a better choice for the companies. the company. Firstly, creative ideas and innovative concepts, which are often lacking in long-term employees, will contribute significantly to the company's prosperity, in some cases even important factors. It seems that young people are stronger and so they are better able to take on big responsibilities and work under pressure than older people. With increasingly fierce competition, a leader needs to deal with many tasks and the elderly may not be able to do it due to health reasons. In short, although I admit that the elderly have can become good leaders, I think young people hold leadership positions.
CÔNG ๖ۣۜBá๖ۣۜ T BᎾℐ ☯️
bn ko làm để người khác làm
anh bạn à anh bạn ko làm thì để người khác làm nha
bạn ko bt làn bình luận lên chi zậy để ai có khả năng làm đc thì để bn bình luận như này thì ...
People argue that top managementpositions should be by young people rather than older peple because old people accumulated considerable specialised knowledge and practical experience through years of working, they can make better decisions.
I don't understand most of what the question is about, as I am only 13 years old but I can offer some of my own opinions on the basis of prior research on the matter.
Firstly, young people are often inexperienced, not as experienced as the elderly, but they dare to challenge themselves, not afraid of difficulties to achieve their goals. They can come up with new initiatives, creative ideas to help the group rise while most of the elderly cannot do that because the function of the body parts has decreased and is not flexible.
Secondly, the older people do not keep up with the trends, the development of society, science and technology while the young people have the ability to approach and catch up very quickly. The world is constantly evolving, requiring people to change and improve themselves in order to survive. Thanks to that, young people can build relationships, communicate, and solve problems better than older people.
Third, the decision of each leader has a very important factor, not only that, but also the way to treat colleagues and people is also a topic of great interest to many people. Elderly people very often do not listen to suggestions but only focus on themselves, they are quite difficult, so very few people have the courage to talk about their shortcomings, that's why a collective, organized by Senior management will not achieve high work performance. In contrast, young leaders will not be like that, they are willing to receive ideas from colleagues and individuals to take it as their own experience, creating an effective and united working environment.
This is just a personal opinion, it may conflict with some of the opinions of many other people because I have not had time to research carefully.
Thanks
lần sau viết chữ tham khảo, tô đậm (nhưng tốt nhất ko nên đưa vào câu hỏi của GV)
ủa mik nhắc bn chuyện này rồi mà
Bạn phải tự viết mới có ý nghĩa. Cop mạng thì cũng chẳng khác gì người khác làm cho bạn.
Pretty nice answer!
Information and ideas are arranged quite coherently
Attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy
A mix of simple and complex sentence forms
WELL DONE!
I think this position should be given to young people.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why it is said that old people can make good leaders. Perhaps the first reason is that (bỏ because) older people often accumulate a large amount of professional knowledge and practical experience over many years of work, they are able to make better decisions. It is clear that today's business environment changes rapidly and it is difficult for young people with little experience to deal with unexpected situations.
Another reason is that the aged leaders seem to be better respected by others and have a more powerful voice. As a result, employees tend to be more obedient and they will easily run the company's operations.
However, on the other hand, I suppose (em có thể thay think bằng từ consider để làm phong phú từ vựng hơn) hiring young people to be managers seems to be a better choice for bỏ the companies.
Firstly, creative ideas and innovative concepts, which are often lacking in long-term employees, will contribute significantly to the company's prosperity, in some cases, they even play important factors. It seems that young people are stronger and so they are likely to take on big responsibilities and are able to work under much more pressure than older people. With increasingly fierce competition, a leader needs to deal with multitasking and the elderly may not be able to do it due to health reasons. In short, although I admit that the elderly have can become good leaders, I think young people can absolutly hold leadership positions.
Lovely answer! Good job!
presents information with some organisation but there may be a lack of overall progression
a limited range of structures and vocab but with attempts
Your thoughts are expressed but the development is not always clear.
All written questions are easy to understand separately, but when they are put together, your ideas seem a bit confusing. Let's try harder next time and your efforts will deserve compliments!
thank you, i will fix the holes in the next post